tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4665971923360779136.post2145566286724046575..comments2024-03-25T10:31:40.979+00:00Comments on Tufty the Cat: The First Section 73(1A) RevocationTufty the Cathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09803006996232662500noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4665971923360779136.post-19219029659735288082016-03-09T12:14:48.424+00:002016-03-09T12:14:48.424+00:00I don't think you could get any more clear cut...I don't think you could get any more clear cut than that one, so I would tend to agree with you. We'll have to wait a few months to find out though.Tufty the Cathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09803006996232662500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4665971923360779136.post-37172275357398247802016-03-09T09:51:45.217+00:002016-03-09T09:51:45.217+00:00I'm glad to see that the IPO are following thr...I'm glad to see that the IPO are following through, and eliminating clearly invalid patents. Looking through the other opinions, I strongly suspect that Opinion 02/16 ("Agricultural Implement", EP2160936) will go the same way, as it's a most clear case of lack of novelty.The Grizzlerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04020705618163343995noreply@blogger.com